Summer doesn’t mean safe – how to protect yourself from ozone pollution
During the winter months, air quality is on most everyone’s minds along the Wasatch Front. It’s difficult to ignore, because we can all see it. Summer air quality is a different beast. The Wasatch Front’s air pollution in the summer is mostly ozone, which you can’t see, unless we also have wildfire smoke which we often do.
Sunlight and high temperatures react with nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds to create ozone pollution. Ozone can form thousands of miles from where its precursors are emitted, and will become even more of a global problem, affecting both rural and urban areas. Ozone is often described as creating an effect of “sunburning” the lungs. But it is also much more than that. It is associated with most of the same diseases that particulate pollution is, i.e. diseases of the heart, lungs, brain, blood vessels, and poor pregnancy outcomes.
As climate change continues to create hotter conditions in Utah, summer ozone is becoming a bigger and bigger issue.
See what the Utah Department of Environmental Quality says about summer ozone.
See what the EPA says about health impacts of ozone pollution.
UPHE in the News on summer ozone pollution:
KSL article
Utah Public Radio
Research on health impacts of ozone:
Numerous studies have shown that air pollution is significantly correlated with rates of Type II diabetes. This study shows the possible biologic mechanism–increased levels of circulating stress hormones and lipid metabolites with even brief exposure to high levels of ozone.
Numerous studies have found a correlation between air pollution and behavioral disorders including unethical behavior. This study of over 86 million people found that correlation also exists for violent crime. Burkhardt J, et al. The effect of pollution on crime: Evidence from data on particulate matter and ozone. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2019; 102267 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102267
This is a landmark study on air pollution and mortality, involving 61 million people from throughout the country. It is published in the most prestigious journal in the world, the New England Journal of Medicine. It significantly strengthens the association between premature death and PM2.5 and ozone. The key findings were that levels of both pollutants, well below the EPA’s standards are still strongly associated with mortality. Specifically, for every 10 ug/m3 of chronic PM2.5 exposure mortality in 7.3%, or .73% for every 1 ug/m3. For ozone, for every 10 ppb, the mortality increased 1.1%. However, at lower concentrations, that association was even stronger. For those people exposed to levels of PM2.5 below 12 ug/m3 (the current EPA annual standard), and below 50 ppb ozone (the current EPA standard is 70 ppb), the risk of death increased to 1.36% for every 1 ug/m3 for PM2.5, and continued at the same rate for ozone, i.e. 1% for every 10 ppb.
This is the strongest research statement yet to establish that: 1. There is no safe level of air pollution. 2. Current EPA standards are inadequate and out of step with the science. 3. The health hazard per unit off exposure is actually greater at the lowest doses. That means public policy needs to address the problem even for those cities that have relatively clean air. 4. The current administration’s attempt to delay or rollback standards will do even more harm than what has been previously calculated. Di Q, et al. Air Pollution and Mortality in the Medicare Population. New England Journal of Medicine, 2017; 376 (26): 2513 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1702747
Ozone is associated with increased rates of hospitalizations for heart attacks.
Chiu HF, Weng YH, Chiu YW, Yang CY. Short-Term Effects of Ozone Air Pollution on Hospital Admissions for Myocardial Infarction: A Time-Stratified Case-Crossover Study in Taipei. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2017 Jun 9:1-7. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2017.1321092. [Epub ahead of print]