Why the state taking over federal lands could be bad for the climate
In a recent interview with the Salt Lake Tribune, the outgoing BLM Director highlighted the growing emphasis on recreation as the future of public lands management. With 11 million visitors to BLM lands in Utah alone in 2023, recreation has become a major economic driver, contributing over $8 billion to the economy. The BLM manages land for multiple uses, including mining and grazing, but we were encouraged to see the agency is increasingly focused on enhancing outdoor recreational opportunities.
Spending time outdoors benefits our health and well-being, having shown to reduce anxiety and promote better physical health. Prioritizing recreation over fossil fuel extraction not only aligns with public demand but also helps address climate concerns. We agree with Director Tracy Stone-Manning that managing public lands should focus on preserving them for future generations to enjoy, reflecting what the public wants—clean air, protected wildlife, and natural spaces.
The state of Utah is suing the federal government over control of BLM lands in Utah, though. The Tribune reported, “Utah Gov. Spencer Cox and other state officials say the BLM has failed to manage its land responsibly. In August, the state sued the federal government, claiming it has no constitutional right to hold onto state land indefinitely.”
The state of Utah remains notoriously pro-mining and pro-industry, often prioritizing these interests over the well-being of its residents. Utah residents often have to rely on stronger federal regulations to protect our health and our environment.